Georgy Kantor

Я так понимаю, что на фоне взятия дедушкой Каином реванша за выборы-2008 ("чтобы победить Обаму, им надо стать"), самой правильной тактикой для сил контрреволюции было бы оставить несчастную Аляску в покое, а просто перекупить кого-нибудь из демократов. Не обязательно умеренных, просто договороспособных. Понимающих, так сказать, все отчаяние своего положения. Не надо говорить, что таких не бывает, я новости читаю - уже есть.

"город (край, штат) напуганных идиотов"

- валяться или кататься? (Я знаю, что работать, но сначала или первое, или второе.)

как пожарные и милиция ищут по миру последнюю группу северокорейских студентов, чтобы объявить их правительством в эвакуации. Но не успевают, потому что те уже добежали до южнокорейского консульства.

EU Paid For Report That Said Piracy Isn't Harmful -- And Tried To Hide Findings
[syndicated profile] slashdot_feed
Thursday, September 21st, 2017 10:40 pm
Posted by BeauHD

https://yro.slashdot.org/story/17/09/21/209229/eu-paid-for-report-that-said-piracy-isnt-harmful----and-tried-to-hide-findings

According to Julia Reda's blog, the only Pirate in the EU Parliament, the European Commission in 2014 paid the Dutch consulting firm Ecorys 360,000 euros (about $428,000) to research the effect piracy had on sales of copyrighted content. The final report was finished in May 2015, but was never published because the report concluded that piracy isn't harmful. The Next Web reports: The 300-page report seems to suggest that there's no evidence that supports the idea that piracy has a negative effect on sales of copyrighted content (with some exceptions for recently released blockbusters). The report states: "In general, the results do not show robust statistical evidence of displacement of sales by online copyright infringements. That does not necessarily mean that piracy has no effect but only that the statistical analysis does not prove with sufficient reliability that there is an effect. An exception is the displacement of recent top films. The results show a displacement rate of 40 per cent which means that for every ten recent top films watched illegally, four fewer films are consumed legally." On her blog, Julia Reda says that a report like this is fundamental to discussions about copyright policies -- where the general assumption is usually that piracy has a negative effect on rightsholders' revenues. She also criticizes the Commissions reluctance to publish the report and says it probably wouldn't have released it for several more years if it wasn't for the access to documents request she filed in July. As for why the Commission hadn't published the report earlier, Reda says: "all available evidence suggests that the Commission actively chose to ignore the study except for the part that suited their agenda: In an academic article published in 2016, two European Commission officials reported a link between lost sales for blockbusters and illegal downloads of those films. They failed to disclose, however, that the study this was based on also looked at music, ebooks and games, where it found no such connection. On the contrary, in the case of video games, the study found the opposite link, indicating a positive influence of illegal game downloads on legal sales. That demonstrates that the study wasn't forgotten by the Commission altogether..."